The Coastal Star

Boca Raton: Judges quash council decision against beachfront duplex

By Steve Plunkett

Boca Raton’s City Council must reconsider its 5-0 decision not to grant permission to build a duplex on the beach, Palm Beach County circuit judges say.

Council members Andrea O’Rourke and Monica Mayotte prejudged the application by 2600 N Ocean LLC proposing a four-story, 14,270-square-foot residence east of A1A between Spanish River Park and Ocean Strand, the judges decided.

At a Feb. 26, 2019, City Council meeting, attorney Robert Sweetapple, representing the landowner, showed a campaign video of then-council member and now Mayor Scott Singer standing on a dune and declaring he could not support plans for a house on the beach. Sweetapple also had copies of emails that O’Rourke and Mayotte had sent constituents saying they would vote against variances for construction seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line.

In a ruling issued Sept. 16, Circuit Judges Jaimie Goodman, Janis Keyser and G. Joseph Curley said Singer’s statements constituted a “general political stance made in a campaign video” and were permissible. But O’Rourke’s and Mayotte’s emails to residents — saying they had “no intention of granting [the application]” and “[would] do all I can to prevent this from happening” — showed they were not impartial, the judges said.

“This was more than mere political bias or an adverse political philosophy — it was express prejudgment of Petitioner’s application,” they said.

Their ruling said 2600 N. Ocean LLC “is entitled to a new hearing without the participation” of Mayotte and O’Rourke, who has since become deputy mayor. That would leave Singer and council members Jeremy Rodgers and Andy Thomson to rehear the application.

But Rodgers, a Navy Reserve officer, has been deployed on active duty to the Mideast and has not attended a council meeting since late June.

Sweetapple promised even more litigation over the parcel, which was recently appraised at $7.2 million.

“Boca Raton has engaged in a decades-long program to deny any development of this private, taxpaying, oceanfront property. To date it has failed to acquire the property as part of its spectacular oceanfront park system,” he said. “The continued denial of any reasonable development of this parcel constitutes a taking. The ongoing illegal actions of the city will continue to be addressed in the courts.”

Each side of the proposed duplex would have had a roof level with a pool, spa, fire pit and outdoor kitchen. Sweetapple said the building would have special glass facing the ocean that would transmit only 10 percent of interior light, below the city’s request for 15 percent, and have only 8 percent reflectivity. Lighting is a concern for nesting and hatchling sea turtles.

Council members caused an uproar when they gave a zoning variance in late 2015 for a four-story beachfront home two parcels south, at 2500 N. Ocean Blvd. The state Department of Environmental Protection issued a notice to proceed with that project, which still needs review by the city's Environmental Advisory Board and another council vote.

Views: 1321


You need to be a member of The Coastal Star to add comments!

Join The Coastal Star

Comment by Gary Youngman on October 8, 2020 at 1:04pm

The residents that occupy this development should be labeled as a sea "monsters".

Comment by Michael Laszlo on September 19, 2020 at 11:32am

To call denial of development 'a taking' is a gross distortion of the facts. The owner bought this beachfront property in full knowledge that construction on this property was forbidden by city law. No restrictions were placed on this lot after its purchase. The law forbidding construction was in place for many years prior to purchase and remains in place.

This developer should not be permitted to take this protected beachfront property. The city should uphold its laws and residents should (and will) continue to resist this development.

Comment by jack mcwalter on September 18, 2020 at 11:15am

This is a bad ruling. The residents of Boca as a group are very opposed to any developments on our beaches and were just expressing their opinions to Mayotte and O"Rourke prior to the vote. For both not to offer their opinions as to how they plan on voting is unreasonable requirement of public officials. If they were stopped on the street and they gave a thumbs up is that not allowed. This judges ruling would alter standard practices by public officials for the whole state . Did the judge give prior Fl case decisions to support his ruling. I think not. Maybe Coastal Star could post the actual ruling so resident read for themselves. The city should appeal. The residents will support Diane and city doing whatever it takes. Putting a mansion on the beaches is totally unacceptable.

© 2021   Created by Mary Kate Leming.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service